[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] DebugInfo work contribution and update.

[Jini Susan George via cfe-dev]

Thanks for the list, Paul. This is quite helpful. DW_OP_implicit_pointer is
something that we are looking into currently. I believe that
"Reference-qualified member functions" has also been implemented.

Thanks!
Jini.



On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:03 AM Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> > From: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:59 AM Robinson, Paul <mailto:
> paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote:
> >> There are many bits of DWARF-5 that haven’t been implemented.
> >
> > Got a short list, by chance?
>
> I can't say I've been keeping track of all that has gone in, but based
> on the list that I came up with when I was sizing the initial DWARF 5
> work, things that might not be done include:
>
> Default location entry
> Inline namespace attribute
> Reference-qualified member functions
> "auto" return type
> Type/item alignment
> Defaulted template parameter
> Atomic type modifier
> DW_OP_implicit_pointer
> .debug_macro section
> Typed expressions
> Supplementary objects
>
> Things I have noticed going in recently:
>
> Call-site and entry-value stuff (is that complete?)
> New language/dialect codes
> Deleted/defaulted members is in progress
> "noreturn" functions is in progress
>
> I can't remember whether split-DWARF is fully v5 compliant...
>
> If any items above are in fact done, my apologies and VERY happy to be
> corrected.
> --paulr
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20191010/6445c843/attachment.html>