[cfe-dev] TSan on Windows?

Dmitry Vyukov via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 2 11:18:35 PST 2019


On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:05 PM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think there are any plans to pursue it in the near future, and I estimate that it would be quite a lot of work to make it work for C/C++. I wouldn't recommend that a newbie take this on, as we've discovered that Windows ASan has an enormous maintenance cost.
>
> I believe Dmitry Vyukov got TSan working on Windows with GCC and Mingw for Go, but I've never compiled it or tried to use it. A large portion of the complexity in ASan comes from fighting with the various MSVC CRTs (static/dynamic, plus every new version) to intercept heap allocation and key string functions like memset, strlen, etc. This matters a lot when looking for races in C/C++ programs, but if you are looking for races in Go, then these things either aren't necessary, or are greatly simplified by committing to static linking with the Mingw CRT.

Yes, Tsan/Go works on Windows for like 5 years without any major
problems. And, yes, it does not have any interceptors.
I don't know what are unique problems for C/C++. Are these fixes for
C/C++ interceptors will fix both asan and tsan? If so, additional tsan
cost may be not too high.
I guess we won't know until we try.
The first thing would be to figure out working virtual address space
layout in tsan_platform.h.


> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 4:22 AM JVApen via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Clang(-cl) on windows has matured well over the last couple of years.
>> A long time ago, I've started making our code base compatible with clang-cl, at a time that `try` and `throw` where not yet supported for this platform.
>>
>> Since that point, I've logged several bugs, did way too many commits on our code and upgraded clang executables several times.
>> With the first executables actually being able to run (in full debug builds), a world of opportunities is available.
>> I was positively surprised to see UBSAN work out-of-the box. (given some false positives in non-standard code, which I still have to fix)
>>
>> Unfortunately, TSAN ain't supported as indicated on https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html and gives a compilation error when you try it.
>> Are their active plans to get this activated on Windows in the near future?
>> If not, would it be feasible for a newbie in llvm-code to look at this?
>>
>> Happy new year!
>> JVApen
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list