[cfe-dev] ignoring*() and hasParent() matchers
Michael Jabbour via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 5 14:50:22 PDT 2018
I ended up writing my matcher like this:
expr().bind("literal"), //inline bind call using a redundant
hasAncestor( //climb up the AST to the nearest
//check that this varDecl satisfies the original condition
Any feedback is appreciated, as I am completely new to LibTooling...
P.S.: The actual matcher I am working on is far more complicated.
Inverting it (i.e. using my very first example) would result in much
more difficult problems. Although this seems like a roundabout hack, it
might be effective when nested inside matchers that have already been tested
On 05/07/2018 7:31 PM, Michael Jabbour wrote:
> Hello all,
> When using has*() it is sometimes desirable to use
> ignoringParenCasts(), for example (from the docs):
> Is there any way to get the same effect when hasParent(), e.g.:
> Obviously this does not work, but what is the best way to achieve a
> similar effect?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev