[cfe-dev] Assistance starting to work on implementing C++20 Designated Initializers?

Walter Gray via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 14 12:55:33 PST 2018

Previously in a thread titled "Working on c++2a Designated Initializers", I
mentioned that I was interested in adding a warning to deal with a
currently unguarded and nasty error where clang can silently fail to emit
code for designated initializers using the C99 Syntax in c++ with non-POD
types. If possible, I'd also be interested in helping add support for the
new C++20 syntax.

Unfortunately, I'm still fairly new to clang and figuring out the ins and
outs of it's structure from zero is proving to be quite difficult. Thus
far, my focus has been on SemaInit.cpp, but I suspect I'll likely have to
modify the AST code too.  Would anyone be willing to have a quick chat to
put together a rough plan for how something like this should be implemented
in clang's codebase? A brief consult or pointer from with someone familiar
with how things are done in clang would be really helpful to figure out how
to go about doing this and answer if I should, for example, be introducing
a new type for c++ 20 style designated initializers to avoid changes to the
C parser, or extending the C99 code and adding various conditionals to
handle the different styles, and if so, where I should be doing that.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20181214/89bb47ac/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list