[cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Updates on SVN to GitHub migration
Nico Weber via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Dec 10 10:58:43 PST 2018
Thanks for the update!
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 1:55 PM Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2018 10:38 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> > Here's another question about the current status of this. It's close to
> two months after the official monorepo was supposed to be published. Can
> someone give an update? Is this on hold indefinitely? Are there concrete
> issues that people are working on and this will happen as soon as those are
> resolved?
> >
>
> There were some issues raised in the thread on llvm-dev:
> "Dealing with out of tree changes and the LLVM git monorepo" This
> migration
> has been delayed while discussing these issues. Discussion on that
> thread has died down and it seems like the consensus is to move forward
> with
> the original plan, but we are waiting to get some formal closure on that
> thread.
>
> > At the least, I'm assuming the "SVN will shut down 1 year from now"
> refers to 1 year from when the monorepo actually gets published, not 1 year
> relative to when the initial mail got sent?
> >
>
> The deadline for SVN shutdown remains unchanged. It's still going to be
> around the 2019 LLVM Developers meeting.
>
> > Someone mentioned an issue with github's svn bridge, but it wasn't clear
> if that's blocking, and if it is if there's a plan for it.
> >
>
> It's not a blocking issue and there haven't been any updates lately,
> you can follow status on this bug:
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39396
>
> -Tom
>
> > Thanks
> > Nico
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 4:10 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via cfe-dev <
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >
> > (+openmp-dev, they should know about this!)
> >
> > Recapping the "Concerns"
> > (https://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#id12) there is a
> > proposal of "single-subproject Git mirrors" for people who are only
> > contributing to standalone subprojects. I think this will be easy in
> the
> > transition period, we can just continue to move the current official
> git
> > mirrors. Will this "service" be continued after GitHub becomes the
> 'one
> > source of truth'? I'd strongly vote for yes, but I'm not sure how
> that's
> > going to work on a technical level.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jonas
> >
> > On 2018-10-20 03:14, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote:
> > > On 10/19/2018 05:47 PM, Tom Stellard via lldb-dev wrote:
> > >> TLDR: Official monorepo repository will be published on
> > >> Tuesday, Oct 23, 2018. After this date, you should modify
> > >> your workflows to use the monorepo ASAP. Current workflows
> > >> will be supported for at most 1 more year.
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> We had 2 round-tables this week at the Developer Meeting to
> > >> discuss the SVN to GitHub migration, and I wanted to update
> > >> the rest of the community on what we discussed.
> > >>
> > >> The most important outcome from that meeting is that we
> > >> now have a timeline for completing the transition which looks
> > >> like this:
> > >>
> > >
> > > Step 1:
> > >> Tues Oct 23, 2018:
> > >>
> > >> The latest monorepo prototype[1] will be moved over to the LLVM
> > >> organization github project[2] and will begin mirroring the
> current
> > >> SVN repository. Commits will still be made to the SVN repository
> > >> just as they are today.
> > >>
> > >> All community members should begin migrating their workflows that
> > >> rely on SVN or the current git mirrors to use the new monorepo.
> > >>
> > >> For CI jobs or internal mirrors pulling from SVN or
> > >> http://llvm.org/git/*.git you should modify them to pull from
> > >> the new monorepo and also to deal with the new repository
> > >> layout.
> > >>
> > >> For Developers, you should begin using the new monorepo
> > >> for your development and using the provided scripts[3]
> > >> to commit your code. These scripts will allow to commit
> > >> to SVN from the monorepo without using git-svn
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Sorry hit send before I was done. Here is the rest of the mail:
> > >
> > > Step 2:
> > >
> > > Around the time of next year's developer meeting (1 year at the
> most),
> > > we will turn off commit access to the SVN server and enable commit
> > > access to the monorepo. At this point the monorepo will become the
> > > 'one source of truth' for the project. Community members *must*
> have
> > > updated their workflows by this date and are encouraged to begin
> > > updating workflows ASAP.
> > >
> > > A lot of people asked at the developer meeting about the future
> > > of bugzilla and phabricator and whether or not we will use
> > > github issues and pull requests. These are important questions,
> > > but are unrelated to the migration of the code.
> > >
> > > We also came up with a TODO list for things we want to accomplish
> > > as a community in the next year and beyond related to github. I
> > > am working on putting these into bugzilla so we can track progress
> > > better and I will send a follow-up email about this.
> > >
> > > -Tom
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://github.com/llvm-git-prototype/llvm
> > >> [2] https://github.com/llvm/
> > >> [3]
> > >>
> https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#for-developers-to-work-with-a-git-monorepo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> lldb-dev mailing list
> > >> lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20181210/5f3e05ba/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list