[cfe-dev] Tidy vs Warnings: missing override

Matthieu Brucher via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 10 06:03:13 PDT 2018


Hi,

I have noticed the missing override warning when using virtual diamond
inheritance. In that case, there was no warning generated.

Regards,

Matthieu

Le ven. 10 août 2018 à 10:23, Jonas Toth via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> I experience the override-warning when it was inconsistent within the
> class (meaning it has been used at least once and some places missed it).
> This measure is probably to not warn on old code bases.
>
> Could this be the case?
>
> Best, Jonas
>
> Am 09.08.2018 um 19:26 schrieb JVApen via cfe-dev:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Today we have discovered a case where we did not have a compiler warning
> for a missing override. To verify, we explicitly enabled the warning with
> the pragma.
>
> While investigating this in the IDE, we noticed that the Visual Assist
> plugin did notice that missing override. As this uses clang-tidy to
> determine this, we were wondering if these differences we noticed are
> intentional. If so, is their any documentation on these differences?
>
> Tnx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing listcfe-dev at lists.llvm.orghttp://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>


-- 
Quantitative analyst, Ph.D.
Blog: http://blog.audio-tk.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20180810/cf7f8d5c/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list