[cfe-dev] clang-tidy / static analysis
Jonas Toth via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 22 09:48:13 PST 2017
If that works do it :)
Maybe a ignoreImplicitCasts is worth a try.
I usually brute force matchers until they work. If someone knows better
ways please teach me :)
Am 22.11.2017 5:52 nachm. schrieb "Richard via cfe-dev" <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> [Please reply *only* to the list and do not include my email directly
> in the To: or Cc: of your reply; otherwise I will not see your reply.
> In article <CAAeLbQLgNGRUwaxE4rwRSE74dm6X-KmM6GtZB2q2V+iacep1=w at mail.
> Maurizio Vitale via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> > [...] Dumping the AST shows an
> > implicitCastExpr there, but even adding it around stringLiteral doesn't
> > work.
> I don't see anything wrong with your approach; it's the one I've used
> successfully in the past. However, I haven't attempted any clang-tidy
> hacking in quite some time so something in the infrastructure might
> have changed in the meantime.
> I've generally gone through cycles of using clang-query, dumping the
> parsed AST and trying things in clang-tidy.
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-
> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org>
> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org>
> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev