[cfe-dev] libclang: Spelling on typedefs lacks namespaces

Alex L via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 10 06:25:02 PST 2017


Hi Michael,

Thanks for the detailed report! I believe you're correct, clang_getTypeSpelling
should return the fully qualified name for the typedefs since it does so
for the other types.

It looks like you're on the right track with the diff that you've shown. I
would encourage you to submit it as a patch (with tests) to cfe-commits,
either by using Phabricator (http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html) or
by emailing the patch directly to the list.

Cheers,
Alex


On 10 February 2017 at 12:39, Michael via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I'm using libclang to parse header files and generate code from them. I
> found that clang_getTypeSpelling() usually includes the namespace(s) a type
> was declared in. However with the exception being typedefs (and same for
> "using A = B"). Not sure if this is a bug or intended behavior, but it
> seems at least inconsistent. I also couldn't really find a good workaround
> for this. I'd have to manually figure out all typedefs (not just pure
> typedefs, they could also be nested template arguments or whatever) and
> then their originating namespaces. This is a bit cumbersome and not really
> straight forward. Getting the canonical type is also not really a solution
> as I would like to keep the typedefs.
>
> Minimal example:
>
> namespace foo {
> class Bar {
> };
> typedef Bar BarDef;
> }
>
> clang_getTypeSpelling on "Bar" (kind "Record") gives: "foo::Bar"
> clang_getTypeSpelling on "BarDef" (kind "Typedef") gives: "BarDef" (<==
> missing "foo::")
>
>
> I had a look into the clang sources. It seems this little patch would fix
> the problem. This was pure guess work, I don't know what deeper
> consequences this might have.
>
> Index: lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp     (revision 294732)
> +++ lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp     (working copy)
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
>
>      static bool canPrefixQualifiers(const Type *T, bool
> &NeedARCStrongQualifier);
>      void spaceBeforePlaceHolder(raw_ostream &OS);
> -    void printTypeSpec(const NamedDecl *D, raw_ostream &OS);
> +    void printTypeSpec(NamedDecl *D, raw_ostream &OS);
>
>      void printBefore(const Type *ty, Qualifiers qs, raw_ostream &OS);
>      void printBefore(QualType T, raw_ostream &OS);
> @@ -798,7 +798,14 @@
>    printAfter(T->getReturnType(), OS);
>  }
>
> -void TypePrinter::printTypeSpec(const NamedDecl *D, raw_ostream &OS) {
> +void TypePrinter::printTypeSpec(NamedDecl *D, raw_ostream &OS) {
> +
> +  // Compute the full nested-name-specifier for this type.
> +  // In C, this will always be empty except when the type
> +  // being printed is anonymous within other Record.
> +  if (!Policy.SuppressScope)
> +    AppendScope(D->getDeclContext(), OS);
> +
>    IdentifierInfo *II = D->getIdentifier();
>    OS << II->getName();
>    spaceBeforePlaceHolder(OS);
>
> (I would of course also fix the unit tests if needed)
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20170210/a0fe6a68/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list