[cfe-dev] Running AST matchers on part of the AST
David Come via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Mon Aug 29 06:10:14 PDT 2016
I'm using clang matchers as an input language to my tool to label
Running it against the full AST works, but it less inefficient.
On 29/08/2016 15:01, Daniel Marjamäki wrote:
> Before you do that.. I would like to know why you would do that?
> I don't think it sounds ok unless there is a good reason.
> Best regards,
> Daniel Marjamäki
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cfe-dev [mailto:cfe-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of David Come via cfe-dev
> Sent: den 29 augusti 2016 14:55
> To: cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> Subject: [cfe-dev] Running AST matchers on part of the AST
> I would like to run some dynamic matchers on a single function body or I can either run it the full AST (MatchFinder::matchAST) or on a single node (MatchFinder::match).
> What is the best way to achieve what I want ? Do you think it is worth I change clang's code and submit a patch ?
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
More information about the cfe-dev