[cfe-dev] Regression in Release Candidate 2
Dan Walmsley via cfe-dev
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 24 09:03:11 PDT 2016
Ok so far I have tested with RC1 and RC2 they both show the regression.
Ok I will try to create a repo and get back in touch.
> From: renato.golin at linaro.org
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:39:56 +0100
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] Regression in Release Candidate 2
> To: dan at walms.co.uk
> CC: hans at chromium.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> On 24 August 2016 at 11:56, Dan Walmsley via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I noticed a regression in this build...
> > libclang, code completeAt...
> > the results returned inbuilt libraries, i.e. memset
> > all come back as char* functionname( void)
> > if I go back to older build (3.7.1) then this information returns.
> Hi Dan,
> Can you narrow down the problem a bit more?
> Is this only with the RC2? Or also with RC1? Does it work with 3.8.0
> or 3.8.1? Some version of trunk?
> Also, that is a *very* high level description of the problem and it's
> really hard to reproduce it. This may be a problem in backwards
> compatibility of libclang (which shouldn't happen), or it could be
> that the completeAt usage was assuming something that wasn't true.
> If you could create a bug explaining the process, stating the most
> recent version that you can see it working, and how to reproduce
> without any additional tools (ie. by using libclang directly,
> preferably with a piece of code that does it), then Clang folks could
> have a better look at that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev