[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

Evgenii Stepanov via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 19 17:40:12 PDT 2016


It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit.
It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> +Evgenii for msan.
>
> I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc
> version is required :-/
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:
>> When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on
>> SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests.  At least some of the
>> msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is
>> available on this platform.
>>
>> I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back.  Is the minimum
>> required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8?
>>
>> When I tried rc1 on sles11.3 x86_64, msan's getrlimit test fails to build
>> for lack of prlimit(). SLES11.3 has glibc 2.11.3. Is there a minimum
>> required glibc? I think this test implementation previously used
>> getrlimit(), which is present on glibc2.11.3.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Diana Picus via Release-testers
>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> All good on AArch64 - we've uploaded the binaries.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Diana
>>>
>>> On 19 August 2016 at 04:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
>>> <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> > Dear testers,
>>> >
>>> > 3.9.0-rc2 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r279183.
>>> >
>>> > This is a release candidate in the very real sense that if nothing new
>>> > comes up, this is be what the final release looks like. There are
>>> > currently no open release blockers, and no patches in my merge-queue.
>>> >
>>> > Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how
>>> > everything goes.
>>> >
>>> > From this point, the branch is only open for fixing critical problems
>>> > (bad enough to warrant another test cycle) and release notes.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Hans
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Release-testers mailing list
>>> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Release-testers mailing list
>>> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Brian


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list