[cfe-dev] LLVM IRC channel flooded?

Wed May 20 14:43:43 PDT 2015

My only other stat for the day. Bot success ratios for builds in the last 30 days:

lldb-x86_64-freebsd
1%
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-debian-fast
1%
clang-x64-ninja-win7
2%
sanitizer-ppc64le-linux
9%
libiomp5-gcc-x86_64-linux-debian
11%
sanitizer-x86_64-linux
21%
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast
21%
ppc64le-clang
23%
sanitizer-windows
27%
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly
32%
libcxx-libcxxabi-arm-linux
35%
sanitizer-ppc64-linux1
41%
ppc64le-llvm
45%
ppc64le-clanglnt
49%
lld-sphinx-docs
50%
libiomp5-clang-x86_64-linux-debian
51%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-apple-darwin14-system-clang
60%
lldb-x86_64-darwin-13.4
61%
clang-x86-win2008-selfhost
64%
clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules
67%
clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh
70%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx14
76%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-cxx1z
77%
lldb-x86_64-ubuntu-14.04-cmake
77%
clang-ppc64-elf-linux
78%
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-fast
80%
perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-parallel-fast
80%
clang-native-arm-cortex-a9
81%
llvm-mips-linux
83%
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fuzzer
83%
clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost-neon
86%
clang-cmake-armv7-a15-selfhost
87%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-debian
87%
clang-native-aarch64-full
88%
clang-aarch64-lnt
91%
clang-native-arm-lnt
92%
clang-hexagon-elf
93%
lld-x86_64-freebsd
93%
clang-ppc64-elf-linux2
94%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-asan
94%
llvm-aarch64-linux
94%
clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75
95%
llvm-hexagon-elf
95%
llvm-ppc64-linux2
95%
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-autoconf
95%
clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel
96%
clang-cmake-armv7-a15
96%
libcxx-libcxxabi-singlethreaded-x86_64-linux-debian
96%
llvm-ppc64-linux1
96%
llvm-s390x-linux1
96%
polly-amd64-linux
96%
clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full
97%
clang-cmake-mips
97%
clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15
97%
clang-x86_64-debian-fast
97%
clang-x86_64-darwin13-cross-arm
98%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu
98%
libcxx-libcxxabi-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-msan
98%
lld-x86_64-darwin13
98%
lldb-x86-win7-msvc
98%
clang-atom-d525-fedora
99%
clang-mergefunc-x86_64-freebsd
99%
clang-sphinx-docs
99%
clang-x86_64-darwin13-cross-mingw32
99%
lldb-x86-windows-msvc
99%
llvm-sphinx-docs
99%
lld-x86_64-win7
100%

> On May 20, 2015, at 2:17 PM, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> By chars in message 37%:
> 
>  chandlerc            358
>  BenL                 455
>  r4nt                 479
>  majnemer             509
>  green-dragon-bot     879
>  jyknight             965
>  nlewycky            1002
>  bb-chapuni          1090
>  echristo            2469
>  llvmbb              6381
> 
>  total                 22145
> 
> Percent chars sender each:
> 
> chandlerc          1.616618%
>  BenL               2.054640%
>  r4nt               2.163016%
>  majnemer           2.298487%
>  green-dragon-bot   3.969293%
>  jyknight           4.357643%
>  nlewycky           4.524723%
>  bb-chapuni         4.922104%
>  echristo          11.149244%
>  llvmbb            28.814631%
> 
> 
>> On May 20, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Just out of curiosity, what's the percentage in volume (chars), not just lines?
>> 
>> On 20 May 2015 9:29 pm, "Chris Matthews" <chris.matthews at apple.com <mailto:chris.matthews at apple.com>> wrote:
>> I did a quick data mine on May’s IRC log.  Bot traffic is 24% of total.  Top IRC posters:
>> 
>>  llvmbb              1434
>>  echristo             334
>>  majnemer             320
>>  Fiora                286
>>  bb-chapuni           237
>>  chandlerc            236
>>  jroelofs             199
>>  myeisha              160
>>  green-dragon-bot     140
>>  compnerd             124
>>  nlewycky             120
>>  EricWF               117
>>  AaronBallman         114
>>  jyknight             113
>>  nbjoerg              113
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 20, 2015, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 5/19/15 9:01 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/19/15 8:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
>>>>> On 19 May 2015 at 15:48, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Also, perhaps the URLs should be shortened?
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's a good idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The format could be: [botname]: [buildername] [short_url]
>>>>>> ("Passed"|"Failed:" [usernames])
>>>>> 
>>>>> The only reason to show "Passed" results is if they were failing
>>>>> before, as a confirmation that whatever you did to fix, worked.
>>>>> Otherwise, they're just noise.
>>>> 
>>>> Good point.
>>>> 
>>>> [botname]: [buildername] [short_url] [revision] ("Fixed:"|"FAILED:")
>>>> [usernames]
>>>> 
>>>> Should the bots blame people for fixes?
>>> 
>>> I filed a feature request ticket for this with the buildbot team, here:
>>> 
>>> http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/3261#ticket <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__trac.buildbot.net_ticket_3261-23ticket&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=CnzuN65ENJ1H9py9XLiRvC_UQz6u3oG6GUNn7_wosSM&m=nOIr_vUGSCRifRkFQPtMmt4QrqNwKRT0VSs4ximyrXY&s=sItkzPhgy2Bezpb1V6Br2NaZJJd7Z8uQCR2M7U5elyM&e=>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Jon
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Jon
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> cheers,
>>>>> --renato
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jon Roelofs
>>> jonathan at codesourcery.com <mailto:jonathan at codesourcery.com>
>>> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150520/4fdf377c/attachment.html>