[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] [RFC] Ideas on improving Compiler-RT CMake
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Tue Jun 2 18:29:14 PDT 2015
On 2 Jun 2015 2:04 pm, "Jonathan Roelofs" <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 6/2/15 2:38 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith wrote:
>>> On 2015-Jun-01, at 19:47, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com> wrote:
>>>> If we drop support for building compiler-rt with GCC, this gets even
simpler. Compiler-rt is *Clang's* runtime library, after all.
>>> I don’t know if it is on the table to drop supporting compiler-rt with
GCC, but that would dramatically simplify things.
>> Weird, I'd assumed building compiler-rt with something other than
>> clang was unsupported. Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't
>> the only supported configuration be building with the just-built
> The current default for an in-tree build is to build compiler-rt with
whatever compiler is being used to build Clang... sometimes that compiler
> I agree though. We should always use the just-built Clang, and have that
behavior be opt-out (if folks need it), instead of opt-in as it is now.
What would the build system do for a cross compile of Clang?
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> Jon Roelofs
> jonathan at codesourcery.com
> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev