[cfe-dev] [RFC] Should an illegal C++11 memory model in an atomic op be an error?

Tim Northover tnorthover at apple.com
Mon Feb 2 13:27:55 PST 2015


Hi Sean,

> Tim, could you shed a bit more light on the context of this patch in rdar://problem/16242991 ?

There's not really any more context: the original bug was asking for some diagnostic, I decided it had to be a warning because legitimate C code can (statically) contain calls like that. It's most likely to come up with macro or template expansion of course.

Cheers.

Tim.




More information about the cfe-dev mailing list