[cfe-dev] Open Clang Project : Document Generation tool with Clang

Alexander Droste via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 29 02:10:07 PST 2015


Hi,

maybe it would be interesting for you to have
a look at DoxyPress which can be set to use
Clang for parsing.

http://www.copperspice.com/documentation-clang.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQphBQMwk7s

-Alex

On 29.12.15 09:54, Kirill Bobyrev via cfe-dev wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> As for me, I Doxygen's parser seems to fall out of line too often. For example,
> you may find many invalid SLoc references while browsing the online Clang and
> LLVM documentation generated by Doxygen. Using a proper parser for the
> documentation generation seems like a great idea, so Clang's parsing seems to be
> a reasonable choice.
>
> By the way, I am a GSoC 2015 student myself, don't hesitate to ping me if you
> have any questions regarding GSoC.
>
> --
> Kirill Bobyrev
>
> On 12/29/2015 9:06 AM, vivek pandya via cfe-dev wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have read about this open project on clang open project page.
>> What would be the advantage of using clang libs to implement doxygen like tool
>> ? I mean is there any use-case that are not implemented in doxygen but with
>> clang it can be implemented. Could some one explain this in a bit detail ?
>> I am currently experimenting with libClang to generate documents from
>> Objective-C (via comments like doxygen ) but my hunch is that generating docs
>> for C++ would be more difficult.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> /*Vivek Pandya*/
>>
>> P.S : I would like to apply for this project in GSoC 2016. How important is it
>> for clang community.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list