[cfe-dev] Using a enum type for a bitfield

[mats petersson via cfe-dev]

Bug number would be 11272 - the text has been mime-encoded to replace the =
with =3D (since mime uses = as a special character, and =3D is the escaped
= sign). Obviously, some step on the way didn't understand the encoding and
left it as plain text without decoding it.

--
Mats

On 26 August 2015 at 08:29, Csaba Raduly via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Hordijk, Michael via cfe-dev  wrote:
> > The short question:
> >
> > Does clang support using an enum as a type for a bit-field?
> >
> > C11 (6.7.2.1 P 5):
> >
> > A bit-field shall have a type that is a qualified or unqualified version
> > of _Bool, signed int, unsigned int, or some other implementation-defined
> > type.
> ...
> > So I'm curious as to whether clang supports it.  I did find this on
> > bugzilla:
> >
> > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11272
>
> LLVM Bugzilla says:
>
> '3D11272' is not a valid bug number.
>
>
> Csaba
> --
> GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
> The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
> Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
> "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus
> Torvalds
> "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150826/8e7908cf/attachment.html>