[cfe-dev] [3.7 Release] RC3 has been tagged, let's wrap this up

Dimitry Andric via cfe-dev cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 21 05:09:19 PDT 2015


Strangely, the clang-tools-extra stuff does build if I manually check it out like so (without any symlinks):

.                        <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_37
tools/clang              <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_37
tools/clang/tools/extra  <-- https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/branches/release_37

I'll investigate, because it would be nice to have those tools.

-Dimitry

> On 21 Aug 2015, at 13:42, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dmitry, if I understood Hans clang-extra wasn't part of the build prior to rc3. Just delete it and run script with --no-checkout.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote:
> Hm, it does not seem to compile at all here?  The build ends with:
> 
> In file included from /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.cpp:17:
> /home/dim/llvm-3.7.0/rc3/llvm.src/tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-apply-replacements/lib/Tooling/../../include/clang-apply-replacements/Tooling/ApplyReplacements.h:19:10: fatal error: 'clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h' file not found
> #include "clang/Tooling/Refactoring.h"
>          ^
> 1 error generated.
> 
> Any idea?  I had no problems at all with -rc2.
> 
> -Dimitry
> 
> > On 21 Aug 2015, at 02:51, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > 3.7-rc3 has just been tagged. Testers, please test, build binaries,
> > upload to the sftp and report results to this thread.
> >
> > Again, a lot of patches got merged between rc2 and rc3, but hopefully
> > nothing that should upset things.
> >
> > One thing that did change is that the release script now correctly
> > symlinks clang-tools-extra into the build. If this causes problems on
> > your platform, please just remove it.
> >
> > This is a release candidate in the real sense: at this point I have
> > zero release blockers on my radar. I will now only accept fixes for
> > critical regressions, and if nothing comes up, rc3 will be promoted to
> > 3.7.0-final.
> >
> > Documentation and release note patches are still welcome all the way
> > up until the final tag goes in.
> >
> > Issues that were on my radar, but I don't consider blocking:
> >
> > - Sanitizer test failures on various platforms, e.g. PR24222. We never
> > ran these tests in previous releases, so it's not a regression. It
> > would be great if the sanitizer folks could look into the test
> > failures, but it's not blocking 3.7.
> >
> > - PR24273: "[ARM] Libc++abi built in-tree with libunwind fails in
> > __cxa_allocate_exception", Renato will exclude libc++ from his build
> > for now.
> >
> > - Lack of key functions in some Instruction classes causing build
> > failures without -fno-rtti
> > (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089010.html). No
> > patches have been forthcoming, so this will not get fixed for 3.7. At
> > least we correctly report -fno-rtti in llvm-config built with CMake
> > now.
> >
> > - r244221: "[SPARC] Don't compare arch name as a string, use the enum
> > instead", owner is unresponsive.
> >
> > - "[lldb] r245020 - [MIPS]Handle floating point and aggregate return
> > types in SysV-mips [32 bit] ABI", owner is unresponsive.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hans
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20150821/c146ceeb/attachment.sig>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list