[cfe-dev] Preferred way to submit patches

[Alp Toker]

On 15/05/2014 14:41, Nikola Smiljanic wrote:
> Phabricator or cfe-commits, whichever you prefer.

If using the web-based system, you'll need to make sure the right people 
are CC'ed, not just those who have accounts there. Mails starting "Hi 
$random_person," is likely to get the patch ignored by the actual code 
owners or maintainers.

It's also polite to respond by email when reviewers post comments to 
patches by email. I've noticed people using Phabricator sometimes reply 
to *their own* mail instead of to the reviewer, and such patches will 
get ignored along with their authors.

Alp.



>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Adam Strzelecki <ono at java.pl 
> <mailto:ono at java.pl>> wrote:
>
>     Hello,
>
>     Just wanted to ask what is currently preferred way to submit
>     patches to Clang, since I recently found that there's also
>     Phabricator for LLVM.
>
>     Currently we have:
>     1. Bugzilla with ability to submit patches
>     2. Phabricator
>     3. cfe-commits
>
>     Cheers,
>     --
>     Adam
>     _______________________________________________
>     cfe-dev mailing list
>     cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>     http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-- 
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts