[cfe-dev] Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor

[Csaba Raduly]

Hi Tom,

On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Tim Toomay  wrote:
> Dump the hyperbole.  It is counter productive.
>
> I am in the camp of people that want to move their msvc code to other
> realms.  I am chiming in for political reasons.  Our stuff is rudimentary
> C++ and we use as little of the host os abuse as possible.  But you can
> barely do anything without interfacing to some important libraries.
>
> It seems obvious that the minimum functionality is that you can compile and
> debug processes with clang that will run on windows. That to me implies
> being able to _LINK_ with platform libraries. To some extent that means you
> have to be able to digest their macros.  But that is not the same as a
> wholesale emulation.  I see no way around doing at least that much
> emulation.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 7/10/2014 2:59 PM, cfe-dev-request at cs.uiuc.edu wrote:
>>
(snip)
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>>     1. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Chandler Carruth)
>>     2. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Edward Diener)
>>     3. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Aaron Ballman)
>>     4. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Edward Diener)
>>     5. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Daniel James)
>>     6. Re: Clang-cl.exe and the VC++ preprocessor (Nico Weber)
>>
(Snipped SIX. HUNDRED. LINES.)

Which of the above messages were you replying to?

You really should learn to use the delete key, especially when
replying to a digest.

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds