[cfe-dev] CXXRecordDecl Name

Nikola Smiljanic popizdeh at gmail.com
Tue Jul 1 15:13:01 PDT 2014


Could you file a bug report for this Daniel?


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:

> I found my answer in 9p11 in the standard.  Seems that without the forward
> declaration it is invalid.
>
> If a class-head-name contains a nested-name-specifier, the class-specifier
> shall refer to a class that was previously declared directly in the class
> or namespace to which the nested-name-specifier refers, or in an element of
> the inline namespace set of that namespace (i.e., not merely inherited or
> introduced by a using-declaration), and the class-specifier shall appear in
> a namespace enclosing the previous declaration.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If I have this code then everything works.  If I get rid of the forward
>> declaration, then any method returns an empty string.  Is the forward
>> declaration mandatory when defining the class like this?
>>
>> namespace N {
>>   class BaseClass1;
>> }
>> class N::BaseClass1 {
>> public:
>>   BaseClass1(int i);
>>   BaseClass1(const BaseClass1 &right);
>>   virtual ~BaseClass1();
>>   BaseClass1 &operator=(const BaseClass1 &right);
>> }
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Try getDeclName(), getNameAsString(), or others.  getName() only works
>>> if the name is a simple identifier:
>>>
>>>   /// getName - Get the name of identifier for this declaration as a
>>> StringRef.
>>>   /// This requires that the declaration have a name and that it be a
>>> simple
>>>   /// identifier.
>>>   StringRef getName() const {
>>>     assert(Name.isIdentifier() && "Name is not a simple identifier");
>>>     return getIdentifier() ? getIdentifier()->getName() : "";
>>>   }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Dilts <diltsman at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am attempting to get the name of a CXXRecordDecl that I have
>>>> identified with an AST matcher.  I am using Class->getName().str() to get
>>>> the class name.
>>>>
>>>> namespace N {
>>>> class SomeNonInterface {
>>>>   virtual void func1() = 0;
>>>>   virtual void func2() {}
>>>> };
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> It works great for the above code.  Gives me "SomeNonInterface" as the
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> class N::BaseClass1 {
>>>> public:
>>>>   BaseClass1(int i);
>>>>   BaseClass1(const BaseClass1 &right);
>>>>   virtual ~BaseClass1();
>>>>   BaseClass1 &operator=(const BaseClass1 &right);
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> For the above code it gives me "" as the name.
>>>>
>>>> How would I get the class name so that it works in all cases, even if
>>>> the name in the declaration/definition is namespace qualified?  Or...did I
>>>> hit a case that isn't legal?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140702/076bea0b/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list