[cfe-dev] compiler-rt non-neon builds are still broken

Jonathan Roelofs jonathan at codesourcery.com
Tue Dec 16 13:51:18 PST 2014


Thanks Renato!

Is there a .fpu directive for wmmx so we could get rid of these too?

#if (!defined(__ARM_ARCH_6M__) && !defined(__ARM_ARCH_6SM__)) || __ARM_WMMX


Jon

On 12/16/14 2:45 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> Ismail,
>
> I haven't tested much, but can you try the attached patch? I think it
> should work under *any* condition, since it uses the .fpu directive. I
> split it in a separate file to not taint the rest.
>
> If that solves your problem, I'll do a last check and will submit to
> phab review.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
> On 15 December 2014 at 20:39, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 15 December 2014 at 20:01, Jonathan Roelofs
>> <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> Think about it from the perspective of a toolchain provider that wants to
>>> ship a multilib that will work on chips with and without neon registers. The
>>> particular example I gave may be bogus, but I think the principle stands.
>>
>> Yeah, I know... I'm just a bit frustrated with how toolchains have
>> being abused for so long that people don't know any more what's
>> sensible and what's just laziness... Ignore me... :)
>>
>> cheers,
>> --renato

-- 
Jon Roelofs
jonathan at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded



More information about the cfe-dev mailing list