[cfe-dev] ClangFormat Additional Options Proposal

[Daniel Jasper]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Haroogan <Haroogan at gmail.com> wrote:

> It looks like not many people on this list are interested in this topic.
> Maybe someone could refer me directly to ClangFormat developers to discuss
> the proposal? Thank you.
>

Are you looking to contribute patches? It is likely that we'll eventually
add support for option #2 as it is also required by GNU's coding
conventions (see llvm.org/PR17851). However, I have not seen coding styles
that always break after "::". If you'd like that option, you might have to
put in the effort yourself. (Also, why not just define the functions inside
Namespace1 and Namespace2?)

Cheers,
Daniel


> Regards,
> Alexander
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/ClangFormat-Additional-Options-Proposal-tp4038901p4039158.html
> Sent from the Clang Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20140429/daf6cf64/attachment.html>