[cfe-dev] Rename cpp11-migrate to be something more general?

[Siraj, Tareq A]

+1 for clang-modernize.

--
Tareq A. Siraj
  Software Developer
  Intel of Canada, Inc.

From: Vane, Edwin
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 12:13 PM
To: Manuel Klimek; Douglas Gregor
Cc: Chandler Carruth; clang-dev Developers; Richard Smith; Guillaume Papin; Siraj, Tareq A; Bernal, Ariel J
Subject: RE: Rename cpp11-migrate to be something more general?

Good with me too.

From: Manuel Klimek [mailto:klimek at google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 4:05 AM
To: Douglas Gregor
Cc: Chandler Carruth; clang-dev Developers; Richard Smith; Vane, Edwin; Guillaume Papin; Siraj, Tareq A; Bernal, Ariel J
Subject: Re: Rename cpp11-migrate to be something more general?

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com<mailto:dgregor at apple.com>> wrote:
Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 2, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com<mailto:chandlerc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Greetings folks!
>
> C++14 is just around the corner, and I thought it would be a good time to float an idea I had a long time ago: should we rename cpp11-migrate to something that frees it to target C++14 and maybe even newer features?
>
> If folks like this general idea, I think we should do it now-ish. =D It's a good time.
>
> My suggested names:
>
>   {clang,cpp}-modernize
>
> I lean slightly toward the 'clang' prefix to match clang-format and other tools.
I like clang-modernize.

+1
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130903/7c37cd53/attachment.html>