[cfe-dev] RFC: What does this matcher mean to you?
edwin.vane at intel.com
Tue May 21 10:10:09 PDT 2013
We're trying to determine the semantics of the proposed new 'equalsBoundNode()' matcher. Before I present the aforementioned matcher expression let me illustrate what this new matcher does. Given that you've bound a node earlier in a matcher expression with a name "X", equalsBoundNode("X") allows you to refer back to that bound node and test for identity. For example, here's a matcher finding VarDecl's where the type matches the initializer type:
Semantics get more interesting where forEach*() matchers are concerned. So this is where I ask: What would you expect the following matcher to do? How would you expect it to behave?
Intel of Canada, Inc.
More information about the cfe-dev