[cfe-dev] SymbolRef and SVal confusion

Jordan Rose jordan_rose at apple.com
Thu Jan 3 11:22:30 PST 2013


SymbolExtent isn't really meant for this; it's supposed to represent the metadata of how large an allocation is in memory. Doing this is basically like changing "return func" to "return sizeof(*func)", except that functions don't really have valid sizes anyway. You really can't put an extent symbol (type size_t) into a loc::MemRegionVal (some kind of pointer-ish thing).

In practice, this lets you do the null test, but won't actually let the analyzer call the function, which is no good.

I don't have any other immediate insights to offer. We just don't have values that can represent either null or a specific function at this time. You might be able to fake it for now by adding a pre-visit check for CastExprs of type CK_FunctionToPointerDecay, and eagerly splitting the path whenever someone references a weak function.

Jordan


On Jan 3, 2013, at 10:03 , Richard <tarka.t.otter at googlemail.com> wrote:

> I had a quick attempt at this, by creating a SymbolExtent of a weak function decl code region and creating a SymbolicRegion with that. This actually fixes the checker I was writing, which is nice. I am not sure if I understand fully the implications of doing this however. Where does the SymbolicRegion need to be constrained back to a FunctionTextRegion?
> 
> Index: Core/SValBuilder.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- Core/SValBuilder.cpp	(revision 171384)
> +++ Core/SValBuilder.cpp	(working copy)
> @@ -190,7 +190,13 @@
>  }
>  
>  DefinedSVal SValBuilder::getFunctionPointer(const FunctionDecl *func) {
> -  return loc::MemRegionVal(MemMgr.getFunctionTextRegion(func));
> +  const FunctionTextRegion *Region = MemMgr.getFunctionTextRegion(func);
> +  if (func->isWeak()) {
> +    const SymbolExtent *Sym = SymMgr.getExtentSymbol(Region);
> +    return loc::MemRegionVal(MemMgr.getSymbolicRegion(Sym));
> +  }
> +    
> +  return loc::MemRegionVal(Region);
>  }
>  
>  DefinedSVal SValBuilder::getBlockPointer(const BlockDecl *block,
> 
> On 20 Dec 2012, at 19:31, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> The problem is that functions are represented by FunctionTextRegions. As you noticed, our design is that only SymbolicRegions can represent NULL—all other regions are known to have an address. However, this is not true for weak symbols (functions or otherwise). In order to get this right, we probably need to enhance the analyzer to treat weak extern symbols like references, and then automatically dereference them upon use.
>> 
>> I don't think the "references" analogy is quite right.  Functions are already modeled in the AST using function pointers, and they are dereferenced during a function call.  We could possibly model weak-linked functions using SymbolicRegions, that are then later constrained to alias a specific FunctionTextRegion.  Aliasing is something we need to handle better anyway, and I think this would nicely fit into that model.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130103/47ebf0e7/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list