[cfe-dev] The size of a pointer to function.

[Tim Northover]

> Hence, the question is the following: are you willing to accept a
> (hopefully) much less invasive patch that *only* ensures the correctness of
> the AST info produced by clang for these (strange and otherwise unsupported,
> but anyway standard compliant) targets?

Even the AST produced can depend rather strongly on the target.
Through obvious things like preprocessor magic, but also through more
subtle issues like overload resolution.

Are you imagining some kind of "target" with full driver support in
Clang but no attempt at CodeGen? Otherwise it's not clear how this
scheme could work.

Tim.