[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Phabricator email

Daniel Sanders Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com
Thu Dec 12 01:55:54 PST 2013


> Dropping replies from the web interface or the mail interface?
> Also: does "dropping replies" mean that an email reply doesn't show up in the phab interface?
> (that's currently "working as intended", until we find enough time to write a parser for inline
> comment replies in mails)

I mean that email replies don't always appear in the web interface. I guess mine usually show up because I tend to top-post and quote parts of the original email (like I did above) rather than reply inline. That would explain the apparent inconsistency I've seen in what appears and what doesn't.

From: Manuel Klimek [mailto:klimek at google.com]
Sent: 11 December 2013 17:02
To: Daniel Sanders
Cc: Renato Golin; LLVM Dev; Clang Dev
Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] Phabricator email

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com<mailto:Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>> wrote:
I'm not getting the error email you mention, but I have noticed it silently dropping replies (including my own on occasion). I haven't spotted anything the missing replies have in common.

Dropping replies from the web interface or the mail interface?
Also: does "dropping replies" mean that an email reply doesn't show up in the phab interface? (that's currently "working as intended", until we find enough time to write a parser for inline comment replies in mails)

For the rest of the errors we've now got an idea about the root cause, and work is going on upstream to fix it (plus, we're looking for a workaround)

Cheers,
/Manuel


The web interface did just pop up with this though:
        Unhandled Exception ("Exception")
        Failed to proc_open(): proc_open(): fork failed - Cannot allocate memory

> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu> [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu>]
> On Behalf Of Renato Golin
> Sent: 11 December 2013 13:51
> To: LLVM Dev; Clang Dev
> Subject: [LLVMdev] Phabricator email
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I seem to be getting an error on every reply to a Phabricator auto-generated
> email, is this happening to everyone? I've seen comments from others not
> registering on it, so I'm assuming this is global.
>
> This means two things:
>
> 1. Phabricator is not catching all replies, which means we have an incomplete
> picture on it, bad for reviews, but at least the info is stored in the lists
> archives.
>
> 2. Every one is getting an annoying Mailer Daemon Error on every reply. ;)
>
> Can we get that fixed, or disable the feature, pls?
>
> cheers,
> --renato
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20131212/d67734d4/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list