[cfe-dev] Bug with address sanitizer?

[Martin Martin]

It turns out, this doesn't happen with the latest build.  Sorry for the
false alarm.


On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Martin Martin <martin at infinio.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The address sanitizer complains about the following code, which looks good
> to me:
>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> int main()
> {
>     char buf;
>     pwrite(1, &buf, 0, 0);
> }
>
> Compiled with:
>
> clang++ -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibiling-calls
> -fsanitize=address -ggdb ./pwrite.c
>
> This is Clang compiled from trunk, many months ago:
>
> $ clang++ --version
> clang version 3.3 (trunk 172721)
> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
>
> I'll try with current Clang trunk.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20130408/d85d0c89/attachment.html>