[cfe-dev] -Wunique-enum; is it worth it?
kremenek at apple.com
Wed Sep 12 15:35:36 PDT 2012
On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Richard Trieu <rtrieu at google.com> wrote:
> This warning caught around 5 bugs. Roughly twice that amount in false positives needed to be silenced.
IMO, that's a pretty dreadful signal-to-noise ratio. That's a 66% false positive rate. That's the kind of false positive rate I'd consider a warning being DefaultIgnore, not be on by default. Do the other false positives look like cases the warning logic could be improved to handle? Less than 10% false positive rate seems required to me for this warning to be on by default.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev