[cfe-dev] Announcement: Phabricator for code reviews

[Manuel Klimek]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:

> Still basically unusable with Apple Mail's obstinate refusal to respect
> "In-reply-to" or "References". I'm definitely giving Phabricator patches
> less attention because the CCs to cfe-commits are too hard to follow. I
> realize that you shouldn't have to change a nice, standards-conforming tool
> to fit our closed-source app's "feature", but...
>
> Any news on turning on auto-"Re" for every reply *after* the initial
> patch posting? I can't think of any ill effects from that, and it matches
> what people do for mailing-list reviews anyway.
>

I just contacted the phab folks and implemented and deployed a fix.

Cheers,
/Manuel


>
> Thanks,
> Jordan
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2012, at 10:18 , Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> Dear LLVM / Clang community,
>
> we'd like to open the use of Phabricator as an optional tool for doing
> code reviews to a wider audience. Please feel free to start your code
> reviews by following the documentation at
> http://llvm.org/docs/Phabricator.html.
>
> Note that e-mail is still the reference medium for code reviews. Please
> let me know about any problems with Phabricator or the documentation you
> find.
>
> Cheers,
> /Manuel
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20121017/73daf891/attachment.html>