[cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] proposal for exploiting undefined behavior much more aggressively

David Chisnall csdavec at swan.ac.uk
Fri Jul 27 02:45:16 PDT 2012

On 27 Jul 2012, at 09:35, annulen at yandex.ru wrote:

> if someone has checked the code and found it UB-free he could allow aggressive UB exploiting.

Surely code that contains no undefined behaviour will gain no benefits from optimisations that exploit undefined behaviour?


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list