[cfe-dev] libc++abi on linux

[Ashok Nalkund]

On 7/8/2012 8:58 PM, Ben Pope wrote:
> For anybody else reading, is there a specific intended direction with
> regard to libc++ on linux?
>
> I guess at a minimum it would be nice if we could say for clang/libc++
> on linux:
>
> * Forget libc++abi (which would be a shame)
> * Use the pathscale components
> * Set your clang defaults using method A

Would there be a recommendation on the different pieces (specifically 
ABI and the unwind libraries)?

> * Rejoice.
>
> I wouldn't even mind if I had two build separately two versions of
> clang; one that works with libc++ (with any abi stuff that works) and
> one that works with libstdc++ (which I'd probably not use).

I actually have 3 builds: clang built with g++, clang build with clang, 
clang build with clang/libc++. Now I'm trying to remove the ABI and 
unwind dependency on GCC.

thanks
ashok