[cfe-dev] Libc++ Windows Semi-analyzed test results

[Ruben Van Boxem]

2011/9/28 Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com>

>
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is a file describing in detail what libc++ tests failed in my
> test run and why (if it could be easily deduced from comparing Clang/GCC
> output or from the helpful Clang error messages). I used a slightly modified
> testit, so that GCC (which doesn't use default a.out on Windows) could also
> run the tests. That patch could use some work, I'll keep it local for now.
> >
> > The good news: a lot of these have trivial fixes, and the fault lies in
> the tests themselves (size of wchar_t, locale names, different number output
> format...).
> > The bad news: Making this document sucked, and I'm never doing it again.
>
> Thanks for your work on this.
>
> >
> > If in any way possible, thid could have a place in the libc++ source
> tree. It would make finding outstanding test failures and their reasons
> easy. Perhaps other platforms could then also keep track of failures. If
> not, I'll create a general bug report for libc++ and attach this document. I
> of course plan to keep this updated once fixes are applied.
>
> There's a link off this page:
>
> http://libcxx.llvm.org/
>
> to:
>
> http://libcxx.llvm.org/results.Windows.html
>

Thanks for the free publicity :)


>
> >
> > A small summarizing note:
> >  - thread needs attention, probably most failures are due to winpthreads.
> >  - io (actually most kinds of streams) needs attention, failures pops up
> everywhere.
> >  - lots of regex failures. Not good.
> >  - numerics has trouble with math functions. Perhaps a format issue.
> >  - stdint.h and uchar.h issues are being dealt with.
> >
> > Re the last point: How does Clang handle __cplusplus and C++11?
>
> #include <iostream>
>
> int main()
> {
>    std::cout << __cplusplus << '\n';
> }
>
> Without -std=c++0x:
>
> 1
>
> With -std=c++0x:
>
> 201103
>

Doh! Could've done that myself. Good to know Clang does it right at least,
even though the support is still incomplete. <evil look at the GCC
developers>

Ruben


>
> Howard
>
> >
> > I'll be using this as a basis to further fix Windows issues, but I'll
> have less time from now on. It is a nice baseline status of libc++ on
> Windows. Help is always appreciated ;-)
> >
> > Ruben
> > <results.Windows>_______________________________________________
> > cfe-dev mailing list
> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20110928/5cb4b21f/attachment.html>