[cfe-dev] alternate clang driver

Konstantin Tokarev annulen at yandex.ru
Mon Oct 24 11:21:36 PDT 2011

24.10.2011, 21:59, "Ruben Van Boxem" <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com>:
> Op 24 okt. 2011 19:53 schreef "Konstantin Tokarev" <annulen at yandex.ru> het volgende:
>> 22.10.2011, 01:47, "David Chisnall":
>> > Adding a dependency on Python (or Lua, or what other buzzword scripting language that you favour this week) for invoking an [Objective-]C[++] compiler seems to redefine overkill.
>> To the defense of Lua, well-written Lua code is almost as fast as C without any JIT, and original interpreter is an executable sized under 200K. So it's no more 'overkill' that shell scripts used by autotools, which are definitely slower.
> Here you're comparing autotools to clang?

Of course no, I'm not. I was referring to shell wrappers like libtool, usually used in conjunction with autootools.

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list