[cfe-dev] LLVM 3.0rc1 Testing Begins!
wendling at apple.com
Sat Oct 22 04:41:31 PDT 2011
On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:57 AM, M.E. O'Neill wrote:
> Although it shouldn't be a roadblock to seasoned testers, I note that in the llvm tarball, tools/clang is a symlink to
> whereas it should probably be a symlink to clang-3.0rc1 since that's what the clang tarball unpacks to.
> In general, if you want a wider audience than folks who regularly build from Subversion to build it, it would probably be a good idea to stick a README in http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.0/ telling people how to build it.
Good point. I'll fix this for phase 2 testing.
> Also, do we want people to be testing libc++ too?
I considered doing a libc++ release, but it's too late in the release timeframe to get started doing this. We don't have a methodology on how to verify libc++, etc. I'll come up with something for 3.1 and beyond.
> Likewise lldb?
More information about the cfe-dev