[cfe-dev] Storage class as written in the source.

[Enea Zaffanella]

Douglas Gregor wrote:
[...]
> The problem I have is that this
> appears to be a GCC extension by accident, since it is not documented
> and has no effect on the translation of the program. The GCC authors
> probably just forgot to check that part of the standard, like we did.
> What is the benefit of modeling a GCC accident that is rejected
> outright by other C++ compilers?

OK, you convinced me.
Here is the revised patch, modified along your suggestions.

Cheers,
Enea.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: StorageClassAsWritten-3.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 53003 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20100418/b12133ca/attachment.bin>