[cfe-dev] [patch] Add configure option for C include search path

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Wed Nov 11 11:10:50 PST 2009


On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Rafael Espindola <espindola at google.com> wrote:
>> I completely agree. All I meant was that we shouldn't try to solve the
>> general problem in this fashion. This is certainly a useful option,
>> and once the -target world comes about it will just construct a custom
>> configuration behind the scenes.
>
> Sure. The only two issues were were discussing were the C and C++
> configure option format and those should probably remain the same.
>
> For C++ I have to first implement the StringRef version of
> SplitString, but is the C option OK? I promise to update its use of
> StringRef :-)

The C option looks fine to me. The C++ option I think is too
complicated, its trying to solve a small subset of the multilib
problem and I think thats a bad idea, I think it should work exactly
like the C option. Anything beyond that is the realm of something more
sophisticated, I think.

 - Daniel

>>  - Daniel
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
>




More information about the cfe-dev mailing list