[cfe-dev] Adding access to array size expressions in ConstantArrayType.
zaffanella at cs.unipr.it
Mon Jun 15 10:05:53 PDT 2009
Enea Zaffanella wrote:
> Eli Friedman wrote:
>> I would prefer that the expr is always passed in explicitly; in
>> addition to getting rid of two confusingly similar prototypes, it'll
>> make it easier to audit the various callers in the patch. (There's at
>> least one caller which I know isn't doing the right thing here.)
> OK, we will remove the old constructor and add the missing null pointer
> to the other calls. Out of curiosity, since we went through *all* of the
> calls of the old constructor, which is the specific call of
> getConstantArrayType that you say we are mishandling?
> Abramo Bagnara and Enea Zaffanella.
Here is the alternative version of the patch where the expression
pointer is always passed explicitly. Please, let us know of this is ok.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-dev