[cfe-dev] False positives when analyzing 'sdlmame'
lbalbalba at gmail.com
Fri Jun 12 13:21:37 PDT 2009
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Luis Felipe Strano
Moraes<luis.strano at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the SDL codebase, but the report generated is
> quite extensive, I'd suggest that you and/or the other developers do
> not simply forget about clang because of these two issues. Not everything
> pointed out there might be an issue, but if you find at least one possible
> problem then it will already have been worth it IMHO.
Well like I stated earlier, I'm not a developer myself and I cannot
tell what the developers of sdlmame will or will not do. However, I
will take up the earlier suggestion and post a bug to the bugtracker
anyway even with my limited information.
More information about the cfe-dev