[cfe-dev] Test coverage

[Daniel Dunbar]

Hi Alisdair,

Yes, you are right its probably worth running on a -Asserts build for
this. For now I think the coverage results are mostly useful for
finding uncovered *lines* of code, I haven't tried to optimize the
process for better numbers since there is still plenty of work to do
there.

 - Daniel

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:29 AM, AlisdairM(public)<public at alisdairm.net> wrote:
> Looking at the test coverage results, I think we are getting lower numbers
> than might be expected as assertions show up as branches not taken.  By
> their nature, most of those assertions should be impossible branches!  So
> should we be running the test-coverage tests with assertions disabled?
>
> If this is already the case then I'm going to have to learn to read the
> output better!
>
> AlisdairM
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>