[cfe-dev] RFC: Clang test runner changes

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Wed Jul 29 20:50:48 PDT 2009

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Mike Stump<mrs at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> You're okay as long as there isn't a section called "Failing Tests".
>> Perhaps the testrunner should be tweaked not to print expected
>> failures, though, since the information there can be easily gathered
>> using grep.
> In non-verbose mode, I don't want to see them either.

Removed, I agree it didn't make much sense. The original idea was we
didn't want to have XFAILs in the tree, but now that this is
semi-standard (at least till C++ is done) it is just noise.

 - Daniel

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list