[cfe-dev] Entity of static functions

[Ted Kremenek]

I think Entity is meant to mainly represent concepts that cross  
translation units.  When reasoning about the specifics of a  
translation unit (including static functions) we have the ASTs.  I  
think the right solution is for CallGraph to represent functions with  
something like an llvm::PointerUnion that acts as a variant type.

On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:59 AM, Zhongxing Xu wrote:

> Current EntityGetter does not create entities for static functions.
> But CallGraph represents functions with Entities uniquely. Static
> functions should also appear in the call graph. So could EntityGetter
> also create entities for static functions. This should not do any harm
> to other parts of clang.
>
> -Zhongxing
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev