[cfe-dev] UCNs/extended characters revisitted
ned at panic.com
Mon Jul 13 10:43:26 PDT 2009
On Jul 12, 2009, at 2:56 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Adding a 2.5M database to clang sounds like a non-starter. When we
> actually care enough about this, hopefully there will be a better way
> to go. Neil, do you know of a good way to do this sort of check?
I'm working on this now. Worst (simplest) case would be two 32K
tables, one for each of the tables in Annex A of TR 10176. Best case
will be less, TBD by how much.
Speaking of which, does anyone have a copy of
ISOIEC_TR_10176_2003_Table.txt as referenced by the aforementioned
public specification? The table is not easily extracted from the PDF
due to it being rotated.
More information about the cfe-dev