[cfe-dev] More thoughts on user defined literals

AlisdairM(public) public at alisdairm.net
Wed Jul 8 18:40:44 PDT 2009

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com]
> Sent: 09 July 2009 02:37
> To: AlisdairM(public)
> Cc: clang-dev Developers
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] More thoughts on user defined literals

> It probably doesn't matter too much whether the tokens are separate; I
> just think it needs to be resolved in the lexer.  It sounded like you
> were intending to reuse tok::identifier for these suffixes, and that
> sounds like a bad idea.

Oh, sorry.  No, I intended to use tok::identifier as the model to learn from.  This is still early days in the compiler-writing business for me ;¬)  I learn best by adapting existing examples, and am trying to feel my way into the compiler with 'low-touch' features.  The more I can do with literals inside lex without ever touching parse and sema the better!  (for now)


More information about the cfe-dev mailing list