[cfe-dev] Fixing selector types on the GNU runtime

Mike Stump mrs at apple.com
Wed Jan 21 11:04:56 PST 2009


On Jan 21, 2009, at 4:18 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> my diff will avoid real issues on platforms like Win64, where 0 and  
> 0L, the two suggested definitions of NULL from the standard, are  
> both smaller than pointers.

What _is_ NULL defined to on Win64?



More information about the cfe-dev mailing list