[cfe-dev] Should we build semantically invalid nodes?
kremenek at apple.com
Sun Oct 26 12:22:43 PDT 2008
On Oct 26, 2008, at 12:16 PM, steve naroff wrote:
>> I'm still struggling to figure out what problem you're trying to
> I think any breakthrough in modularizing Sema (or not) will come from
> developing new clients.
I agree with Steve and Chris here. While there is value in looking
forward, the demands of real clients will clarify our (future) needs
from Sema, further modularity in Clang, new Action modules, and so
forth. At this point much of this discussion, although extremely
interesting, seems dominated by discussion about hypothetical issues.
More information about the cfe-dev