[cfe-dev] Should we build semantically invalid nodes?
    Argiris Kirtzidis 
    akyrtzi at gmail.com
       
    Fri Oct 24 04:29:53 PDT 2008
    
    
  
Argiris Kirtzidis wrote:
> To get more specific about Sebastian's patch, I tried it out and it 
> works quite well, Clang is pretty robust:
>
> typedef int fn(int,int);
> int f() {
>  int a;
>  reinterpret_cast<fn>(a)(1,2,3);
>  int (*fx)(int,int) = reinterpret_cast<fn>(a);
> }
I mean, Clang builds a nice AST tree of everything for the above snippet.
    
    
More information about the cfe-dev
mailing list