[cfe-dev] Tentative typeid Parser/AST implementation

Doug Gregor doug.gregor at gmail.com
Tue Nov 11 05:25:31 PST 2008


On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Sebastian Redl
<sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at> wrote:
> Doug Gregor wrote:
>> I guess that depends... if you're planning to make sizeof and alignof
>> different AST nodes, then we can eliminate the bit for isSizeOf and
>> make the structures smaller than they used to be. If sizeof and
>> alignof are the same AST node with an isSizeOf bit, then of course the
>> isTypeOperand bit is free.
>>
>
> True. For now, I'm leaving them as the same node. If people think having
> separate nodes is better, I can do that, too.

Okay, thanks for doing this!

  - Doug



More information about the cfe-dev mailing list