[cfe-dev] C++ status report web page

[Eli Friedman]

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Your comment is wrong for reinterpret_cast. You don't always cast
> from a pointer to a pointer. reinterpret_cast allows you to cast from
> a pointer to non-pointer, as long as the type cast to can hold the
> size of the pointer's value without loss of precision. So clang fails
> to emit an error in this situation:

I'm not completely sure what this comment is in reply to, but I don't
see the relevance to this discussion.  Are you arguing that we don't
have full support for reinterpret_cast, and therefore shouldn't claim
that?

In any case, would you mind making sure this is filed in Bugzilla so
we don't lose track of it?

-Eli