[cfe-dev] Objective-C top-level constructs code generation
csdavec at swansea.ac.uk
Mon Aug 11 17:55:14 PDT 2008
On 12 Aug 2008, at 01:29, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
> Hi David,
>> Sadly, I haven't had a chance to do much with this lately. I still
>> have a huge pile of clang diffs sitting on my machine waiting to be
>> submitted, and I've made a number of bug fixes in the copy of
> As you may have noticed I have started work on support for the NeXT
> runtime. While I'm not going to go out of my way to change the
> CGObjCRuntime interface if there are things that need to be changed or
> improvements to the API I was planning on doing them.
I haven't updated clang for a while, since Chris's changes to the
ObjC stuff filled my tree with conflicts and after spending two days
failing to untangle them I ran out of time to work on clang for a bit.
> Obviously this is an issue if you have outstanding diffs vs the
> interface. I don't want to make extra work for you but its not
> clear what
> else we can do.
My original plan was to have the runtime-specific code in clang
isolated and reusable for implementing other dynamic languages on top
of an Objective-C runtime. This was possible with the old interface,
which isolated clang-specific and runtime-specific code in separate
files. The new interface breaks this layering, and so I will
probably have to use the version I have forked for Smalltalk as a
Io implementations contacted me a while ago about using this,
although I think they also wanted a NeXT runtime implementations
which is likely to be a low priority for me) and back-port the
changes to clang periodically.
> What kinds of changes are in the "huge pile" of diffs? Are they
> changes to the internals or have you also significantly changed the
> If it is only the internals then this might not be so bad, but if
> the interface
> has changed as well would it make sense to simply update the
> current interface
> to match your revisions so that the diffs will go easier in the
I haven't made any changes to the runtime interface - I just haven't
updated my copy to correspond to the new one. Before Chris's
changes, I had ObjC support in my local tree up to the point where
the only problems compiling GNUstep's Foundation and AppKit libraries
came from bits of C not implemented. The Étoilé runtime
implementation is now only in my local tree - Chris didn't update it
to his new interface and so the version in trunk became too bit-
rotted to remain and was removed a few weeks ago.
I have sent most of the changes to the list at various points, but
haven't had a chance to address all of the review comments in them.
I don't think many were related to the runtime-specific components.
There were quite a few little changes related to mapping the ObjC
type system to LLVM, and a few minor changes in various places where
I encountered problems compiling ObjC code.
If you have more time to tidy and polish the changes than me then I'd
be happy to send you a diff from my tree. I think it was down to
just over 1000 lines before Chris's changes (not including the code
to support the Étoilé runtime).
More information about the cfe-dev